Home›Blogs›AILET

Legal Reasoning Questions on General Exceptions Under IPC for CLAT

Aparna Shukla 16 October 2020 1 min read
Given below are the two sets of legal reasoning questions on general exceptions under IPC for CLAT. Solve them to check your knowledge on the topic.

Set 1

  1. Alisha was driving a car at night with due care and precaution. Suddenly a man ran to the road from the forests on the side and got hit by Alisha’s car and died. Alisha is liable
  1. Radhe went out for a party with his friends and drank alcoholic drinks. Under the influence of alcohol, he entered into a fight with the bartender and killed him. His lawyer pleaded the defence of intoxication.
  1. Which of the following is not a general exception under IPC
  1. The informer told the Army officer that landmines were installed at Gate no.1 and hence he should enter from gate no. 2. He had gathered this information and believed it to be true. The officer used Gate no. 2 and as he walked, the landmines blasted and he died.
  1. The legal maxim Actori incumbit onus probandi means

Set 2

  1. A man attended a wedding where he was on gunpoint to marry a girl of 10 years of age. Later, he has been accused of committing the offence of child marriage.
  1. A woman was kidnapped and a 25-year-old man was put on gunpoint to rape that woman. He raped her. The 25-year-old man is
  1. A has kept B on the gunpoint and is about to shoot him. To save B, C throws a stone at A and it hits A’s head and A dies of excessive bleeding.
  1. The defence under Section 85 and 86 of the IPC is available only if:
  1. The maxim related to the defence of trifles under section 96 of IPC is

Answer

  1. (c)
  2. (a)
  3. (a)
  4. (c)
  5. (b)
  6. (a)
  7. (b)
  8. (c)
  9. (a)
  10. (a)
Join our WhatsApp channel Daily CLAT PG updates & discussion Join now → Join our Telegram channel Notes, PYQs & exam alerts Join now →