Home›Blogs›CLAT

Provisions on National Emergency under the Indian Constitution

Indrasish Majumder 11 February 2025 2 min read
Edit TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Declaration of National Emergency The Extent of a National Emergency Revocation of proclamation of Emergency Significant Implications of the Proclamation of Emergency Important Case Laws on Proclamation of Emergency

Introduction

There are three types of emergencies under the Indian Constitution:
Part XVIII of the Constitution of India deals with Emergency Provisions. According to Article 352, in the event that the President, upon receiving a written recommendation from the Council of Ministers, is convinced that a serious emergency situation has arisen, posing a threat to the security of India or any of its regions, the President is authorised to issue a proclamation of emergency based on the following grounds.
  1. War
  2. External Aggression: The concept of external aggression refers to acts of aggression or hostile behavior initiated by one state or entity towards another state.
  3. Armed Rebellion: The act of armed rebellion refers to the organised use of force by a group of individuals with the intention of challenging the security of the state.

Declaration of National Emergency

The Extent of a National Emergency

Revocation of proclamation of Emergency

The revocation of Proclamation Article 352 (7) and (8) entails the President’s action of rescinding the proclamation in the event that the House of People passes a resolution expressing disapproval of it.
In accordance with Clause 8 of Article 352, if a minimum of one-tenth of the entire House of People submits a notice for revocation:
  1. In the event that the House is in session, a notice should be directed to the Speaker.
  2. Conversely, if the House is not in session, the notice should be directed to the President. In either scenario, the Speaker or President must convene the special sitting of the House within 14 days of receiving the notice.

Significant Implications of the Proclamation of Emergency

It is important to acknowledge that, in contrast to Article 358, the suspension of the right to approach any Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights under Article 359 is not a spontaneous or automatic process. The acquisition of this can only be facilitated through the issuance of a presidential directive.

Important Cases on Proclamation of Emergency

The Supreme Court of India has the power to review the validity of the Proclamation of National Emergency. The Court can examine whether the President’s satisfaction about the existence of an emergency is based on relevant material or is arbitrary. Judicial review ensures that emergency powers are not misused and that constitutional safeguards are upheld.

Miverva Mills v. Union of India (1980)

The declaration of a national emergency is not subject to judicial review as enumerated by the 38th Amendment Act of 1975. This clause was later removed, by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978.The Supreme Court ruled in the Minerva Mills case (1980) held that a national emergency proclamation might be contested in court on the grounds of malfeasance or that it was founded on entirely unrelated and extraneous factors.

ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla

ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla Case is commonly referred to as the Habeas Corpus case. Prior to the implementation of the 44th Amendment Act, the Supreme Court had established that individuals did not possess a legal entitlement to approach the Court for the purpose of enforcing fundamental rights in the event of a state of emergency being declared.
Following the implementation of the 44th Amendment Act, it has been established that individuals possess the right to approach the Supreme Court in order to seek the protection and enforcement of fundamental rights as guaranteed by Articles 20 and 21, even in situations where a state of emergency has been proclaimed.
Join our WhatsApp channel Daily CLAT PG updates & discussion Join now → Join our Telegram channel Notes, PYQs & exam alerts Join now →