1. Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab is related to:
a. Admission
b. Secondary Evidence
c. Confession
d. Leading Question
2. The case of Pakala Narayan Swami v. King Emperor is related to:
a. Dying Declaration
b. Cross Examination
c. Privileged Communication
d. Doctrine of Estoppel
3. The constitutionality of which section was challenged in the case of State of UP v. Deoman Upadhyay?
a. Section 28
b. Section 27
c. Section 26
d. Section 25
4. Queen v. Abdullah is related to:
a. conduct
b. motive
c. admission
d. preparation
5. Dying declaration is defined in which of the following sections:
a. Section 27
b. Section 17
c. Section 32
d. Section 22
6. Can a police officer record a dying declaration?
a. Yes, but with witnesses around
b. No
c. Yes, but with the consent of the doctor
d. No, only Magistrates can record such declarations
7. Dying declaration can be made through:
a. nods
b. words only
c. gestures
d. all of the above
8. Which one of these is an important case related to identification parade?
a. Queen Empress v. Abdullah
b. Ram Lochan v. State of West Bengal
c. Ramnathan v. State of TN
d. All of the above
9. Section 17 of Indian Evidence Act, defines admission as any statement made-
a. Oral form
b. Documentary form
c. Electronic form
d. All of the above
10. Are extra-judicial confessions allowed under the IEA?
a. Yes, but it has a very weak evidentiary value
b. No
c. Yes, along with other evidence
d. No, it is illegal
Answers
- c
- a
- b
- a
- c
- a
- d
- d
- d
- a