Given below are the practice questions of statement conclusion for LSAT and other law entrance exams. The difficulty level of these questions ranges from easy to moderate and it will help students to develop the right approach for this kind of questions.
Questions
- Statement: One should not consume too much coffee.
Conclusion I: Tea is better than coffee.
Conclusion II: Too much coffee can be harmful to health.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Smart work is also mandatory to pass an exam.
Conclusion I: Hard work is not important to pass an exam.
Conclusion II: One must work smartly if he wants to pass an exam.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Statement: Only Asian paints give life to the walls. – An advertisement
Conclusion I: The walls start talking.
Conclusion II: No other paint can add paint will give life to the wall.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Statement: Everything that happens in life is a consequence of the choice you make.
Conclusion I: Every choice has a consequence.
Conclusion II: Good choices will have good consequences
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Statement: All the plants are not to be kept in sunlight.
Conclusion I: Some plants are shade-loving plants.
Conclusion II: some plants are to be kept away from sunlight.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Statement: One must use Food Grade Plastic to store the food.
Conclusion I: Food Grade Plastic harms the food much lesser than other kinds of plastic.
Conclusion II: Food Grade Plastic is costlier than other kinds of plastic
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Statement: Price of Potato in the market has increased exponentially.
Conclusion I: People will not get staple food now.
Conclusion II: People will not eat vegetables now.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both conclusions are valid.
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- The Government is trying to promote the quality of self-reliance in the public.
Conclusion I: Self-reliance is a quality that the Government wants the individual to develop.
Conclusion II: Government will not help the public anymore.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- Carpooling is seen as an effective measure for fuel saving. Fuel-saving is essential for sustainable development.
Conclusion1: Carpooling is an effective practice for sustainable development.
Conclusion: It is difficult to save fuel in any other way.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
- X is the singer who sings more than 60% of the songs in the industry.
Conclusion I: Mr X is the highest-paid singer in the industry.
Conclusion: II: Mr X can sing pop and rock.
- Only conclusion I is valid.
- Only conclusion II is valid.
- Both the conclusions are valid
- Neither conclusion I nor II is valid.
Answers
- (b)
- (b)
- (b)
- (a)
- (c)
- (a)
- (d)
Subscribe for updates
Join 10,000+ subscribers.
AP
Aparna Shukla
Contributing author
Have a doubt about this?Ask Doubts
