Home›Blogs›CLAT

Understanding Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: Part II

Devanshu Agrawal 19 December 2024 4 min read

Introduction

This is the second article in the series of articles which would deal with such changes not only in the BNS but also BNSS and BSA. This article would specifically deal with the modifications to the punishments, deletion of offences, and other relevant additions to the new Penal Code.

Read More: Decoding Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita- Part I

Punishments under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

 The BNS has increased the punishment of imprisonment in almost 33 offences, including:
Fine as another form of punishment has also seen modifications in around 83 offences. The earlier colonial fines of 10/-, 100/-, 200/-, 250/-500/- etc. have been increased to 1000/-, 2500/, 5000/-,10,000/- etc.to make the fines in line with the current scenario.
In addition, mandatory minimum punishment has been introduced in 23 offences including buying child for the purpose of prostitution, organised crime, terrorist act, hurt to deter public servant from his duty, personating a public servant, theft etc.
To make the punishment proportionate to the crime, the BNS has also introduced community service as a form of punishment under section 4(f) of BNS for the first time for the six offences of:
(i) Public Servant unlawfully engaging in trade under section 202 of BNS
(ii) Non-appearance in response to a proclamation published under sub section (i) of section 84 of BNSS is punishable under section 209 of BNS
(iii) Attempt to commit suicide to compel or restrain exercise of lawful power of public servant under section 226 of BNS
(iv) Petty theft on return of theft money and a person is convicted for the first time under section 303(2) of BNS
(v) Misconduct in public by a drunken person under section 355 of BNS
(vi) Defamation under section 356 of BNS. However, the term ‘community service’ remains open to judicial interpretation and enforcement as it has not been defined in the Act.
Furthermore, a Standing Committee Report recommended that the term ‘community service’ be defined appropriately and the scope of this punishment should be clarified. However, this suggestion has been neglected in the actual text of the Act. This vagueness has the peril of increased judicial subjectivity in interpreting and enforcing this penal mode. 

Other Notable Changes under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

The offence of adultery as stipulated under erstwhile Section 497 of the IPC has been deleted from the BNS, in pursuance of the decision of the Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India. In addition, Section 377 of the IPC has been completely deleted from the BNS. In the landmark judgement of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, the SC partially struck down the provision of Section 377 which made consensual sexual intercourse between same-sex individuals an offence.
However, the Court did not strike down the parts of this provision dealing with bestiality, sodomy, etc, owing to them being separate offences withing the same provision. However, the BNS has entirely removed the provisions, creating potential gaps in dealing with those offences which were not expressly declared unconstitutional by the Court. 
The BNS has also abolished the colonial-era sedition law (Section 124A of the IPC) but retains its essence in Section 152, criticized for its vague and non-defined terms like subversive activities and endangers sovereignty. While the 2023 Law Commission recommended keeping sedition with amendments, the lack of clear definitions may lead to misuse, risking individual liberties until clarified through judicial rulings.
The repeals and savings clause in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which repeals the Indian Penal Code (IPC), includes provisions to protect the previous operation of the IPC and actions taken under it. By making Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 applicable, it ensures that penalties, punishments, investigations, or remedies initiated under the IPC remain valid.
However, the BNS further states that any action taken under the IPC will be deemed to have been taken under the corresponding provisions of the BNS. This raises concerns about the retrospective application of the new penal code, potentially violating Article 20 of the Constitution, which prohibits convicting a person for an offence not punishable by law at the time of its commission.
This provision could lead to legal challenges, as it might blur the distinction between the repealed IPC and the newly enacted BNS, creating ambiguity about the applicable law and its temporal jurisdiction.

Conclusion

This article was the second in the series of articles covering the changes made in the new criminal laws. This article covered the changes in the punishments, modifications in scope of the offences, deletion of offences, replacement of key words and potential concerns with the applicability of BNS. The next couple articles would cover the changes in the BNSS and the BSA  

Read More: Decoding Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita- Part I

Join our WhatsApp channel Daily CLAT PG updates & discussion Join now → Join our Telegram channel Notes, PYQs & exam alerts Join now →