HomeBlogs

CLAT 2021: Students Speak Up Against the High Cost of Raising Objections

UM
Umang Poddar
25 July 20212 min read
The deadline to raise objections to the CLAT 2021 paper (UG and PG) ended yesterday.
As per the CLAT notification, “a fee of Rs. 1,000/– (Rs. One Thousand only) is to be paid for each objection and if the objection turns out to be valid, the said fee will be refunded/remitted to the same account from which it was paid. “
The notification further says that if the candidates “raise Objections on their own Question Booklet and the Question Number does not match with the Master Question Booklet, CLAT Office will not respond to such objection(s).“
This condition has come under censure, with students writing about how this would prohibit people from speaking up. Many have written on social media as well.
This is especially so since every year’s CLAT has had some form of a hiccup. Whether it is results being republished, or the computers’ malfunctioning, or the question paper being riddled with inconsistencies.
This year’s question paper also has some inconsistencies. Read CLATalogue’s and CLATapult’s analysis here.
Plus, the fact that CLAT charges Rs. 4,000, which is a pretty steep amount by any standard. Asking students to pay an additional Rs. 1,000 per question would be a big hindrance to people wanting to raise grievances.
As it is, more than 70,000 students give the exam. This means that the Consortium of NLUs, which organizes the exam, gets a large sum of money just from the exam fees itself.
The pattern of holding CLAT points to a larger issue that plays out at law schools also. Diversity surveys by NUJS and NLS show that these colleges largely comprise people from high-income families.
If law has to be made a more inclusive space, then it must start from how the induction process works. The Consortium must make amends to the CLAT exam.
You can check our LIVE blog on all CLAT related news here.
Subscribe for updates
Join 10,000+ subscribers.
UM
Umang Poddar
Contributing author
Have a doubt about this?Ask Doubts
Related reading
BlogsSupreme Court Eases 3 Year Practice Rule To 1 Year: Judiciary Aspirants Get Major Relief BlogsCan Police Upload Photos of Accused Persons on Social Media? BlogsSupreme Court Eases 3 Year Practice Rule To 1 Year: Judiciary Aspirants Get Major Relief
UM
Written by
Umang Poddar
CLATalogue
For submitting a Postshruti.chauhan@lawctopus.com
For banner ads & admission campaignsrohit.bhutani@lawctopus.com
Office hours: 10.30 AM – 7 PM
Useful LinksAbout UsAdvertiseContact UsAsk a QuestionMoot Suite
We are Hiring
Lawctopus Law School

The law school you always wanted! Learn practical legal skills.

For LLS Coursescourses@lawctopus.comVisit site
Connect
© 2026 CLATalogue. All rights reserved.|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service
Subscribe to our newsletter
MahindraPrism AI
CLATalogue
Notes
PYQs
Case Law Updates
Mocks
Ask a Doubt
Blogs
CLATAILETLegal UpdatesLawctopus Law School
Life at Law School
Contribute
Sign in