HomeBlogs

Important Judgements for CLAT PG 2024: Chotkau v. State of UP

IN
Indrasish Majumder
30 January 20231 min read
Date – 3rd October 2022
Court – The Supreme Court of India
Bench – Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice A.S. Bopanna, and Justice V. Ramasubramanian
Highlight- Court cannot make someone, a victim of injustice, to compensate for the injustice to the victim of a crime.
  • The Supreme Court acquitted a man who was sentenced to death for the alleged rape and murder of a six year old girl.
  • In this case, the appellant was convicted for the offenses punishable under Sections 302 (murder) and 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to death by a Sessions Court in Uttar Pradesh, which was confirmed by the Allahabad High Court. On the basis of the last seen theory and circumstantial evidence, the appellant was charged for the commission of the offences of raping the minor girl and murdering her.
  • The Counsel for appellant said that the evidence to support the last seen theory was insufficient to convict the appellant and there was complete failure on the part of the prosecution to examine material witnesses.
  • The Apex Court observed that “While every delay in forwarding the FIR may not necessarily be fatal to the case of the prosecution, Courts may be duty bound to see the effect of such delay on the investigation and even the creditworthiness of the investigation.” “The failure of the prosecution to produce such evidence, despite there being no obstacle from the accused or anyone, will certainly create a gaping hole in the case of the prosecution and give rise to a serious doubt on the case of the prosecution.”
  • The Supreme Court while allowing the appeal held that “By fixing culpability upon the appellant without any shred of evidence which will stand the scrutiny, the prosecution has done injustice to the appellant. Court cannot make someone, a victim of injustice, to compensate for the injustice to the victim of a crime.”https://indiankanoon.org/doc/12892785/
Subscribe for updates
Join 10,000+ subscribers.
IN
Indrasish Majumder
Contributing author
Have a doubt about this?Ask Doubts
Related reading
BlogsSupreme Court Eases 3 Year Practice Rule To 1 Year: Judiciary Aspirants Get Major Relief BlogsCan Police Upload Photos of Accused Persons on Social Media? BlogsSupreme Court Eases 3 Year Practice Rule To 1 Year: Judiciary Aspirants Get Major Relief
IN
Written by
Indrasish Majumder
CLATalogue
Notes
PYQs
Case Law Updates
Mocks
Ask a Doubt
Blogs
CLATAILETLegal UpdatesLawctopus Law School
Life at Law School
Contribute
Sign in
MahindraPrism AI
CLATalogue
For submitting a Postshruti.chauhan@lawctopus.com
For banner ads & admission campaignsrohit.bhutani@lawctopus.com
Office hours: 10.30 AM – 7 PM
Useful LinksAbout UsAdvertiseContact UsAsk a QuestionMoot Suite
We are Hiring
Lawctopus Law School

The law school you always wanted! Learn practical legal skills.

For LLS Coursescourses@lawctopus.comVisit site
Connect
© 2026 CLATalogue. All rights reserved.|Privacy Policy|Terms of Service
Subscribe to our newsletter