Questions on In-absentia Trials under BNSS, 2023 for CLAT PG

In absentia trials have been introduced under BNSS, 2023, under section 356A. It empowers the courts to conduct trials against the proclaimed offenders who have evaded justice. The offense committed by them must be punishable with imprisonment of 7 years and above. The concept of in absentia trials has secured its constitutional validity under Article 21 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India.

The conviction under an in absentia trial needs to be proved beyond reasonable doubt in order to maintain evidentiary rigor. This provision reflects India’s commitment to not allowing the accused person to frustrate the justice process in the country. Thereby, balancing swift justice with fundamental fairness.”

a) Section 365
b) Section 356
c) Section 356A
d) Section 358

a) 90 days from proclamation
b) 60 days from proclamation
c) 45 days from proclamation
d) 30 days from proclamation

a) The accused needs to be a proclaimed offender
b) The offence must be punishable with imprisonment of 7 years and more
c) The court should be satisfied that the accused is a evading trial
d) All of the Above

a) Friend of the Court (Amicus Curiae)
b) Counsel appointed by the session court from the panel of district legal services authority
c) Public defender appointed by the state government
d) All of the above, depending on the gravity of the case and the discretion of the court.

a) The conviction is upheld and the accused can only appeal now
b) The accused is entitled to a fresh trial as a matter of right
c) The court can order a retrial at its discretion
d) The conviction is automatically set aside

a) Prevent the abuse of justice by the accused persons
b) Expedite the process of disposal of cases
c) Reduce the burden on the courts by eliminating the need for presence of the accused person
d) All of the Above

a) Magistrate’s Court where the offense has been committed
b) The sessions court
c) Supreme Court
d) Court of competent jurisdiction as determined by the nature of the offence

a) Article 21
b) Article 20 (3)
c) Article 22(1)
d) Both 1 and 2

a) Through physical means at last known address
b) Electronic mode, affixation and publication in the local newspaper
c) Through SMS and Mail only
d) Through registered post

a) CrPC, 1973, had no such concept
b) CrPC, 1973, allowed in absentia trials for all offences, but BNSS, 2023, has restricted it to only heinous offences
c) BNSS, 2023, has introduced a framework for in absentia trials whereas CrPC, 1973, allowed ex-parte proceedings in summons cases
d) No such difference exists among both legislation.

a) The wife’s claim will be put on hold till the completion of in absentia trial
b) The claim will be dealt separately under the civil law
c) The court conducting the in absentia trials has exclusive jurisdiction over such claims
d) None of the Above

a) Balance of probabilities
b) Proof beyond reasonable doubt
c) Prima facie satisfaction of the court
d) Clear and conclusive evidence

a) An accused has been declared a proclaimed offender and has fled abroad after framing of charges against him
b) An accused who has absconded before framing of charges
c) An accused who has been evading process for more than 90 days post-proclamation
d) All of the Above

a) Only the appointed counsel for the accused
b) The state alone
c) The accused personally upon appearance or through duly authorised representative
d) An aggrieved party, including the victim

a) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 14)
b) United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organised Crimes (Article 11)
c) United Nations Convention Against Corruption (Article 44)
d) European Convention on Human Rights (Article 6)